Criminal Defense Recent Cases in Bozeman, MT

TK-115-2026-01518: DUI / Implied Consent

Client was charged with DUI and lost his driver’s license under Montana’s implied consent laws after refusing or allegedly failing a chemical test. Holloway and Hulling challenged the State’s case by demonstrating a lack of admissible evidence to prove impairment, resulting in DISMISSAL of the DUI charge and reinstatement of the client’s driver’s license.

TK-100-2025-4918: PFMA / Self‑Defense

Client was charged with Partner or Family Member Assault (PFMA). Holloway and Hulling conducted an in‑depth investigation, established that the client acted in lawful self‑defense, and located corroborating witnesses to support the account, which led to a DEFERRED prosecution agreement and ultimate DISMISSAL of the PFMA charge.

TK-125-2026-419: DUI Reduced to Non‑Criminal Traffic Offense

Client was charged with DUI. Holloway and Hulling successfully negotiated DISMISSAL of the DUI and a plea to the lesser non‑criminal traffic offense of Driving Over a Divided Barrier or Space, resulting in only a $50 fine and NO DUI conviction.

TK-100-2026-1723: The client was charged with DUI. Holloway and Hulling successfully challenged the sufficiency of the evidence, resulting in a REDUCED CHARGE and resolution to Reckless Driving.

TK-155-2026-56 & 75: The client was charged with Surreptitious Viewing and Violation of a Protection Order. Counsel challenged the statutory elements of the offenses, leading to DISMISSAL of the surreptitious viewing charge and a no-contest plea with a deferred sentence on the violation charge. Temporary Order of Protection was DISMISSED.

TK-100-2025-5911: The client was charged with DUI. After challenging the underlying investigation, the case was resolved with a REDUCTION to Reckless Driving.

TK-695-2026-54 & 55: The client was charged with Aggravated DUI (3rd), Careless Driving, Unlawful Possession of Alcohol in a Motor Vehicle, Leaving the Scene of an Accident, and Failure to Give Notice of an Accident. Holloway and Hulling challenged the expansion of the stop and investigation resulting in a plea to Negligent Endangerment and CREDIT FOR TIME SERVED.

TK-100-2026-1723: DUI charge was REDUCED to reckless driving after Holloway and Hulling successfully challenged issues with the traffic stop and negotiated with the State, resulting in a $350 fine and no jail time.

TK-115-2025-3609: Client was initially facing a felony strangulation charge, two PFMA charges, two unlawful restraint charges, two counts of endangering the welfare of children, and one count of violating a protection order. Holloway & Hulling successfully negotiated a plea agreement to one PFMA and one unlawful restraint charge, with CREDIT TO TIME SERVED.

TK-100-2026-0001152: Reckless driving charge DISMISSED at the initial appearance after Holloway & Hulling successfully argued there was insufficient evidence and a lack of probable cause

TK-100-2026-1579: Aggravated DUI charge was DISMISSED by the Court after Holloway and Hulling challenged probable cause at the initial appearance. 

TK-115-2026-556: A PFMA that Holloway and Hulling challenged on the grounds of insufficient evidence which resulted in a DEFERRED Disorderly Conduct.

TK-100-2026-79: DUI charge challenged by Holloway and Hulling resulting in a plea to Reckless Driving.

TK-100-2026-242, TK-100-2025-887: (2) separate PFMA charges resulting in a DEFERRED prosecution agreement.

TK-115-2025-3541: DEFERRED Prosecution Agreement for MIP

TK-635-2026-136: DUI charge successfully challenged by Holloway and Hulling at the initial appearance. Mr. Calvin argued officers lacked probable cause and the case was DISMISSED.

TK-125-2026-56: DEFERRED Prosecution Agreement for Driving While Suspended 

TK-100-2026-0000634: Client was charged with two felony counts of Criminal Endangerment and DUI. Holloway and Hulling successfully challenged the arresting officer’s narrative and conduct, which included actions that raised significant constitutional concerns. H&H secured DISMISSALS of all charges prior to the case being filed in District Court. 

TK-100-2026-0000256: Prior to district court filing, Holloway & Hulling challenged a Felony Strangulation charge due to investigative errors. The County Attorney’s Office agreed and moved to DISMISS the charge.

TK-100-2025-5834: Prior to district court filing, Holloway & Hulling challenged a Felony Strangulation charge on both lack of probable cause and investigative errors. The County Attorney’s Office agreed and moved to DISMISS the charge.

Past results do not ensure similar results in future cases, as each case is unique and should be evaluated based on its individual merits.